
You know how it feels when you are in the middle of planning out a new data architecture, and someone asks, ‘Should we use Microsoft Fabric or just Power BI?’ Each tool at the table has its own strengths, and it’s a very fair question to ask. In modern data narratives, this discussion is not uncommon. Fabric and Power BI, on the surface, give the impression that they are linked in some manner, even synonymously. However, both serve varying purposes at different levels.
Microsoft is incessantly refining its offered data tools and services, and if you’re making decisions that impact infrastructure, analytics options, or business intelligence systems, understanding evolving resources becomes of utmost importance. Fabric and Power BI are two of its offerings. Let us explore Microsoft Fabric vs Power BI focusing on the relationship each holds along with their functions.

Consider the impossibility of orchestrating an operation encompassing analytics, reporting, transformation, storage and even ingestion with over five tools, just like wrangling cats. That is the problem Microsoft Fabric solves.
Microsoft Fabric, launched in 2023, is an all-in-one data analytics superstructure that contains every aspect of data analytics needed. It combines the most useful parts of Azure Synapse, Power BI, Azure Data Factory and many others – you can regard it as an environment that eliminates centuries of struggle integrating business intelligence, data warehousing, real-time data analytics, and data science into one ecosystem.
Now, let’s talk about Power BI. If you’ve worked in business intelligence over the past decade, you’ve almost certainly built or at least seen a Power BI dashboard. Its data visualization solutions have become the industry standard, especially for organizations entrenched in the Microsoft ecosystem.

Where Power BI really shines:
In many organizations, Power BI capabilities are the final layer of how people experience data. The frontline. And while it’s powerful, it’s not built to manage massive-scale data orchestration on its own. That’s where Microsoft Fabric steps in.
Now, what we propose is perhaps controversial: What do you consider to be the most notable differences between Microsoft Fabric and Power BI? The most straightforward analogy possible is that if Power BI is the storefront, Microsoft Fabric is the factory, warehouse, and supply chain behind it.
Now, let’s fix the over-simplifications.
Power BI is focused on data visualization and reporting. It captures data as a stakeholder lens.
As for Microsoft Fabric, it encompasses everything from data ingestion, engineering, science, and storage to real-time processing. It is a comprehensive data platform.
Power BI user segments include business analysts, department leads, and a grade or two lower citizen data scientist.
On the other hand, users of Fabric are data engineers, data scientists, BI developers, and IT architects responsible for managing workflows within sophisticated data ecosystems.
Data in Power BI is stored internally in a compressed engine, VertiPaq, optimized for analytics.
In Fabric, it’s OneLake that provides storage through Delta Lake for ACID-compliant scalable shared storage across workloads.
Multiple data sources can be connected using Power BI for Excel, SQL, or APIs. The drawback is the lack of native orchestrations or streaming pipelines.
In contrast, Fabric allows control over data workloads for ingestion, modeling and operationalization from a unified interface–the utmost in ease of use.
It is not simply about tools; it deals with different components in the data stack.
Now, despite these differences, Fabric and Power BI aren’t competitors. They’re designed to work hand-in-glove. One doesn’t replace the other; they enhance each other.
Let’s walk through a real-world scenario.
Say you’ve got streaming telemetry data coming in from manufacturing equipment. With Fabric, you can:
What’s happening here is pure synergy: Fabric handles the plumbing, and Power BI brings the polish.
| Feature | Microsoft Fabric | Power BI |
| Primary Role | End-to-end data platform | Data visualization and reporting |
| Data Storage | OneLake (Delta Lake format) | VertiPaq Engine |
| Target Users | Data engineers, IT teams | Analysts, business users |
| Real-Time Analytics | Yes | Limited without external tools |
| Data Integration | Native pipelines (Data Factory) | Via connectors, limited ETL |
| Visualization | Limited (basic preview only) | Extensive, interactive, customizable |
| Machine Learning | Supported via Notebooks and ML workloads | Not native, requires integration |
| Governance & Security | Enterprise-grade (Purview, Azure AD) | Row-level security, sensitivity labels |
One of the best ways to understand a tool is to see it in action. Let’s look at how different businesses might use Microsoft Fabric and Power BI together or separately.
Fabric: Ingests patient data, sensor streams, and appointment logs. Runs analytics on patient outcomes.
Power BI: Visualizes key health metrics by department and location. Tracks patient satisfaction.
Fabric: Connects marketing data, website logs, and sales data. Builds customer segments.
Power BI: Monitors campaign ROI and tracks KPIs like conversion rate or average order value.
Fabric: Consolidates transactions, compliance logs, and fraud detection pipelines.
Power BI: Dashboards for risk analysts executive reporting on revenue performance.
These aren’t theoretical. We have seen these architectures deployed in the wild, and when done right, the payoff is big: better agility, fewer silos, and faster time to insights.
Let’s not gloss over this: Microsoft Fabric is built on lessons learned from Azure Synapse Analytics, and it shows.
Azure Synapse contributed the core analytics engine for SQL-based queries.
The new Lakehouse architecture gives users the flexibility to store unstructured, semi-structured, and structured data all in one place.
Data Integration is seamless thanks to built-in connectors, Dataflows Gen2, and prebuilt templates.
And yes, real-time analytics is no longer an afterthought. With support for event streams and KQL (Kusto Query Language), Fabric can respond to data as it arrives. This is a game-changer for use cases like fraud detection, logistics tracking, or predictive maintenance.
Here’s our honest opinion, coming from years of wrangling data systems: if you’re trying to decide between Microsoft Fabric and Power BI, you’re asking the wrong question.
Power BI isn’t going away; it’s the face of data for most business users. But Fabric? Fabric is what’s going to make your data operations sane again.
If you’re a decision-maker, think of Fabric as your long-term foundation. If you’re a BI developer or analyst, see it as the engine behind the dashboards. And if you’re still trying to duct tape together Hadoop clusters, ELT jobs, and four different dashboards just to get basic insights… well, maybe it’s time to modernize.
Do you have a project in mind?
Tell us more about you and we'll contact you soon.